Perbedaan Pengetahuan Balance Scorecard, Motivasi, dan Kompensasi Kinerja dalam Penerapan Keberhasilan Balance Scorecard (Studi pada Sekolah Singapore National Academy)

  • Maria Kumalasari Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jawa Timur
  • Dwi Suhartini Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jawa Timur
Keywords: Keywords: balanced scorecard, performance measures, level of understanding, extrinsic motivation, intrinsic motivation, compensation

Abstract

This research aims to examine the different of balance scorecard’s level of
understanding, work motivation and performance compensation toward the
success of balanced scorecard’s implementation. The better the derstanding ofbalanced scorecard, motivation and performance compensation are expected to increase the use of performance measures that lead to the success balanced scorecard implementation. The implementation of balanced scorecard success is shown in the use of common and unique performance measures in a balance way. The data collection method used 2x2x2 factorial experimental design, with 48 participants from Singapore National Academy School. Data analysis was performed by two-way ANOVA test. The results show that the level of understanding of the balanced scorecard and performance compensation cause differences in the success of balanced scorecard. Whereas extrinsic and intrinsic motivation do not cause differences in the success of balanced scorecard.

 

Keywords: balanced scorecard, performance measures, level of understanding, extrinsic motivation, intrinsic motivation, compensation

References

Anas, S., & Sholihin, M. (2011). Pengaruh Keterlibatan dalam Pemilihan Inisiatif Strategis Terhadap Evaluasi Inisiatif Strategis dan Kinerja Manajer Divisi yang Menggunakan Balanced Scorecard, Simposiun Nasional Akuntansi XIV.Aceh.

Astuti, W., & Supriyadi. (2014). Pengetahuan Balanced Scorecard, Motivasi Ekstrinsik dan Keobjektifan Penggunaan Ukuran ukuran Kinerja Balanced Scorecard. Simposium Nasional XVII, Lombok.

Atkinson., Anthony, A., Kaplan., Robert, S., Matsumura., Ella, M., & Young, S. (2012). Akuntansi Manajemen, Edisi Kelima, Jilid 2. Jakarta: Indeks.

Belkaoui, A.R. (1989). Behavioral Accounting: The Research and Practical Issues. Connecticut: Greenwood Press, Inc.

Belkaoui, A. R. (2002). Behavioral Management Accounting. USA: Quorum Books. Dally, D. (2010). Balanced Scorecard Suatu Pendekatan dalam Implementasi MBS. Cetakan Kedua. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosda Karya.

Dearman, D. T., &Shields, M, D. (2005). Avoiding Accounting Fixation: Determinants of Cognitive Adaption to Differences in Accounting Methods. Contemporary Accounting Research. Vol.22(2), pp.351-384.

Dilla, W. N., & Steinbart, P. J. (2005). Relative Weighting of Common and Unique Balanced Scorecard Measures by Knowledgeable Decision Makers. Behavioral Research in Accounting. Vol.17, pp.43-53

Erdiana, D. (2017). Instrospeksi Inilah Peringkat Pendidikan. Retrieved from http://dianerdiana.blogspot.co.id/2017/05/introspeksi-inilah-peringkat-pendidikan.html.Griffin, R. W., & Ebert, R. J. 2013. Bisnis.Edisi Kedelapan. Jilid I. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Hendriyanto, A. (2012). Pengaruh Motivasi Intrinsik, Ekstrinsik terhadapKinerja Karyawan (Studi pada PERUM BULOG Sub DIVRE Surabaya Selatan), Jurnal tidak terpublikasi Universitas Brawijaya.Kaplan, R. S., (2010), Conceptual Foundations of the Balanced Scorecard. Handbook of Management Accounting Research. Volume 3 Harvard.

Kurniawati, E. T., & Juniarti. (2014). Studi Eksperimental: Mengurangi Bias Pengukuran Umum Balanced Scorecard dalam Peningkatan Kinerja pada Mahasiswa S1 Angkatan 2010 dan 2012. Business Accounting Review. Vol.2(2), pp.123-132.

Libby, R., &Luft, J. (1993). Determinants of Judgment Performance in Accounting Settings: Ability, Knowledge, Motivation, and Environtment. Accounting, Organizations and Society. Vol.18(5), pp. 425-450.

Libby, R., Steven E. S., & Alan, W. (2004). The balanced scorecard: the effects of assurance and process accountability on managerial judgment. The Accounting Review. Vol.79 (4), pp.1075-1094.

Lipe, M. G., & Salterio, S. E. (2000). The Balanced Scorecard: Judgmental Effets of Common and Unique Performance Measures.The AccountingReview, Vol.75(3), pp.283-293.

Nahartyo, E., & Utami, I. (2016). Panduan Praktis Riset Eksperimen. Cetakan 1. Jakarta: PT. Indeks.

Niven, P. R. (2002). Balanced Scorecard Step-by-StepMaximizing Performance and Maintaining Results. New York. NY: John Wiley & Sons.

Pramono, J. (2014). Analisis Pengukuran Kinerja SMK Negeri 6 Surakarta dengan Pendekatan Balanced Scorecard. Gema. th.XXVI/48/Februari 2014-Juli 2014

Robbins, S. P & Judge, T. A. (2013). Organizational Behavior Edition15. New Jersey: Pearson Education

Tayler, W. B. (2010). The Balanced Scorecard as a Strategy-Evaluation Tool: The Effects of Responsibility and Causal-Chain Focus. The Accounting Review. Vol.85(3), pp.1095-1177.

Unani & Juniarti. (2014). Studi Eksperimental: Mengurangi Bias Pengukuran Umum Balanced Scorecard dalam Penilaian Kinerja pada Mahasiswa S1 Program Manajemen Keuangan. Business Accounting Review. Vol.2(2), pp.252-265.

Yuksel, H., & Coskun, A. (2013). Strategy Focused Schools: An Implementation of Balanced Scorecard in Provision of Educational Services. Jurnal Procedia-SocialandBehavioral Science. Vol.106, pp. 2450-2459.
Published
2018-06-09
How to Cite
Kumalasari, M., & Suhartini, D. (2018, June 9). Perbedaan Pengetahuan Balance Scorecard, Motivasi, dan Kompensasi Kinerja dalam Penerapan Keberhasilan Balance Scorecard (Studi pada Sekolah Singapore National Academy). Journal of Economics, Business, and Government Challenges, 1(1), 50-61. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33005/ebgc.v1i1.9